-
- 2009-04-09 @ 19:13:28
-
- 2009-04-10 @ 17:39:16
If a tree is gonna be cut down to make space in the forest - it had better not be mine.
-
- 2009-04-10 @ 17:43:06
by becoming preoccupied by the religious bits - You missed the main point.
White people are going extinct.-
- 2009-04-10 @ 18:16:39
"White people are going extinct."
OMFG! CALL THE NATIONAL GUARD!
-
- http://poppycock.blog.co.uk/
- 2009-04-09 @ 20:54:30
I must agree with Tom, the clip does includes a strong element of religious propaganda, what I would class as a "false morality."
The reason there are fewer children is because women no longer want the bother of large families. I don't think men really come into the equation, as generally they will go along with whatever their chosen mates decide.
If society could convince women that more children would give them greater satisfaction, then there would be more children.
In the past childhood death-rates were so high that having lots of children was the only way of at least bringing two or three to adulthood. Modern medicine has made this precaution unnecessary, leading to most families having only two children maximum. As it would take a minimum of three kids per family to keep the population growing, we, in the "west" are experiencing a gradual reduction.
-
- 2009-04-10 @ 17:40:55
To keep a people going you need 2 things.
1) A homogenus country with secure borders.
2) an average offspring count >2
White europeans have neither of these.
Thats why White Europeans are going extinct.
-
- 2009-04-09 @ 21:51:42
I didn't follow the final points about the womens rights, gay rights environmental issues all being wrapped up together and being based on 1970s' ideas about the population bomb.
In any event, its a very partial piece - no analysis of Indian, African, Indo-Chinese or Chinese population and demographic issues, for instance.-
- http://poppycock.blog.co.uk/
- 2009-04-09 @ 22:37:07
You make a good point, the article does seem to have an element of White Supremacist politics behind it.
-
- 2009-04-11 @ 11:23:25
Survival is not supremacy.
-
- http://poppycock.blog.co.uk/
- 2009-04-11 @ 11:46:58
What's wrong with interbreeding until we're all a nice warm brown colour?
-
- 2009-04-12 @ 11:49:27
If thats what some ppl want - that is their choice.
by the same logic.
If some people want to remain seperate, that is their choice.-
- 2009-04-12 @ 23:41:13
Why do you care?
-
- http://poppycock.blog.co.uk/
- 2009-04-11 @ 11:50:32
It's supremacist because you are assuming that white is better and must therefore be preserved.
-
- 2009-04-12 @ 11:48:30
Saying somthing should be preserved does not imply thinking it is better.
They can all be preserved.
-
- 2009-04-10 @ 17:45:15
Here are your facts and figures.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6pzPp1Q2ew -
- 2009-04-30 @ 19:48:12
"I didn't follow the final points about the womens rights, gay rights environmental issues all being wrapped up together and being based on 1970s' ideas about the population bomb."
Exactly. I would like to think that I support ME having rights (aka "women's rights") as being based on the fact that I am a human being who can think for myself, know what I want and make my own decisions, just like any other human being.
16 Comments to The Demographic Winter of Western Civilisation
Related posts
-
A Warning for America from South Africa
on 2009-07-05 – 12:00:59 -
The crimes of Atheists
on 2008-06-07 – 01:06:02
SeasideMan
Pro


If it were true, the population reduction would be great news. The planet could do with far fewer humans. Unfortunately I don't think it is, and furthermore the religious overtones of that clip tend to undermine it.
Tom.