The post about Jane Fonda being a traitor for some reason sprang into my mind whilst reading about the four Labour members of the House Lords who have been willing to sell the laws of their country to the highest bidder in yet the most recent example of the corruption which grips this current government.
Some have said that because it is not explicitly stated anywhere that Lords should not be paid to amend legislation on behalf of their clients (the rest of the world would call it bribery), then this is somehow OK.
Lord Taylor of Blackburn, one of the scumbag peers named in the Sunday Times investigation, doddered to his noble feet to simper: "If I have done anything that has brought this House into disrepute, I most humbly apologise.
"I feel within my own conscience I followed the rules." To which I say - your concience is deficient for the task you were entrusted with, you have been caught red-handed so kindly resign you old fraud.
Others have said that because the newspapers who discovered this trade had not actually enriched these greedy politicians (beyond their everyday pay at public expense for being Lords) - money had not changed hands - those hands are not dirty and should continue to be raised in our legislature determining the content of our laws and the fate of our land. I say, if the newspapers had paid over the cash, the Lords would all be complaining of entrapment, and anyway, as they are admitting what they have done, and intended to do, the fact the money didn't change hands is neither here nor there.
Some have said this is all very shocking: standards must be maintained, the sanctions available against those who break the rules of the House 'must be reviewed'. 'Something must be done', old boy.
The Lib Dems think that this is a case for the Met. I can't disagree. But I also think Her Majesty has a role to play in all this. She agreed to these sleazy people being Lords, after all.
Is this corruption not a breach of the oath of their office?
"I, ____________, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God."
After all, whatever an act of faithful and true allegiance actually is, I am sure we can all agree that to sell amendments to bills in Parliament cannot be an act of true allegiance to Her Majesty, the Head of State. It is simply an act of allegiance to the biggest cheque-book. Why can't the Queen just remove from public office these thieves of our democracy and subverters of the constitution simply for breaking their oath of office?
![ATT0000455[1]](http://data5.blog.de/media/654/3176654_9c8b82c6c1_m.jpg)
![ATT0000566[2]](http://data5.blog.de/media/655/3176655_fb996f1cf5_m.jpg)

